Social media use is particularly concerning for adolescents who are in a vulnerable phase of behavioral, mental, and social development. Studies estimate that up to 95% of high-school aged adolescents use social media, with nearly one-fifth of them report “almost constant” use. Despite a minimum age requirement of 13 for many platforms, nearly 40% of children aged 8 to 12 are already active users. In May 2023, the United States Surgeon General released an advisory highlighting social media’s role in exacerbating the youth mental health crisis. While social media offers potential benefits—such as providing a sense of community for marginalized individuals (e.g., LGBTQ+ youth) or fostering creativity—its risks cannot be overlooked. A 2023 survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that social media users were more likely to experience bullying, report persistent feelings of sadness, and consider or plan suicide. Additional risks include exposure to explicit content, sleep disruption, and reduced time for schoolwork, physical activity, and face-to-face interactions.
Numerous approaches have been identified to reduce social media usage. Recognizing that social media is intentionally designed to be engaging, often mimicking addictive patterns, is an important first step. Reflecting on social media’s impact can be valuable, such as whether it contributes to happiness or useful knowledge. This mindfulness practice can help narrow usage scope or frequency. There are also applications that can limit social media use by tracking screen time. Many platforms offer settings to hide upsetting content or disable notifications. Additionally, engaging in in-person activities can offer alternative forms of fulfillment.
About 20% of high-school aged adolescents reported almost constant social media use.
Image Source: rbkomar
Despite the many strategies to reduce social media use, research lacks a clear consensus on a specifically effective approach. A notable challenge is the inconsistent definition of a “digital detox,” which may range from a total abstinence to partial restriction. Additionally, outcomes in these studies are often subjective and based on self-reported data. The American Academy of Pediatrics recently reviewed current literature and found both positive and negative effects social media disconnection. Positive outcomes included greater awareness of digital habits, higher life satisfaction, improved real-life relationships, and increased productivity. On the other hand, negative effects included increased loneliness, fear of missing out, increased stress, and the possibility of relapsing. This suggests a potential “sweet spot” for disconnection. For participants with only reduced usage, they had more sustained benefits, such as reductions in anxiety and depression, compared to those who entirely disconnected.
Other factors, such as age, gender, and geographic location, also influence the effectiveness of social media reduction strategies. For instance, adolescents in rural areas may rely more heavily on social media to maintain social connections. These nuances underscore the need for further research for tailored solutions that address diverse circumstances. Thus, achieving a “Goldilocks” balance in which the duration and approach to social media reduction are neither too extreme nor too lenient appears to be key for fostering sustainable, positive changes.
Featured Image: © escapejaja / Adobe Stock
